Financial Forensics Labs — offline tools for due diligence
FFL · Forensic Finance Intelligence · financialforensicslabs.com.ar

Every Corporate Failure Leaves Behind a Pattern.

Compare live opportunities against 140 documented forensic cases — frauds, governance failures, restructurings and corporate collapses — before capital is committed. Runs 100% offline: no cloud, no install beyond opening an HTML file in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. Built for investors, lenders and deal teams operating under real-world time pressure.

Offline. Private. Practical.No cloud. No account.
The Framework

Not For Reading. For Screening.

FFL transforms documented corporate failures into practical investment risk frameworks. Identify recurring collapse patterns, governance weaknesses, financial red flags, management incentive problems and structural risks — before a transaction closes.

01
Collapse Patterns
Recurring failure architectures across cycles and sectors.
02
Governance Weaknesses
Board, audit and ownership structures that precede loss.
03
Financial Red Flags
Accounting signals documented across confirmed frauds.
04
Management Incentives
Compensation, equity and reporting misalignments.
05
Structural Risks
Capital stack, jurisdictional and counterparty fragility.
Current Release

Three Products. One Methodology. Zero Cloud.

140 Documented Forensic Cases. All Offline.

SKU · 01

FFL Trial

Free · pay-what-you-want

Run a real deal through the full screening engine — Deal Intake, Additional Context, Forensic Screening — matched against a 20-case sample library. See exactly how Tools works before you buy it.

Limited trial dataset of 20 cases. Export and print are disabled in this version.

Get the Trial →

Or request it free by message below

Also available: Case Index · Tools
SKU · 02

FFL Case Index

The full 140-case forensic database, searchable by sector, geography, mechanism, axis, and fraud hexagon vertex. Runs 100% offline — no cloud, no subscriptions, no one knows what you're investigating.

Also available: Trial · Tools
SKU · 03

FFL Tools

The full engine — Deal Intake, Additional Context, Forensic Screening — scored against all 140 documented cases across 11 forensic dimensions and 55 questions. Generates a complete Investment Committee Memo, ready to bring into a real IC meeting.

Also available: Trial · Case Index

Offline first. Runs locally. No internet required. No account required. No confidential deal data ever leaves your machine — which matters when your firm's data policies don't allow uploading anything. A 10-minute sanity check for an MD or analyst, without the compliance risk of a cloud tool.

Provisioning notice · Each copy of Tools is provisioned individually and the billing/order data is embedded inside the encrypted tool file itself. Any redistributed copy can be traced back to the original purchaser.

Localization & custom builds · Need Tools in your language? Send a message

Included In Tools

Calibrated To How You Actually Invest.

Available today in FFL Tools: 11 forensic dimensions, 55 questions, calibrated per asset class. Choose the module that matches the deal and get an IC-ready memo, offline.

Available

Private Equity

55 unique questions calibrated for buyout, growth equity and control transactions

  • GP governance structure and conflict of interest exposure
  • Management team incentive alignment and equity rollover
  • Investment Committee reporting and red flag documentation
  • Leverage structure, covenant package and TRS exposure
  • Related-party transactions and fee extraction risk
  • Exit readiness and comparables analysis
  • Fund-level concentration and LP reporting obligations
Available

Private Credit

55 unique questions calibrated for direct lending, mezzanine and preferred equity

  • Security interest perfection and lien priority verification
  • Credit deterioration patterns and early warning indicators
  • Covenant package stress testing under adverse scenarios
  • Borrower entity verification and sanctions screening
  • Default indicators matched against FFL historical cases
  • Collateral valuation independence and control rights
  • Cross-jurisdictional enforceability and legal opinion coverage
Available

Venture Capital

55 unique questions calibrated for early stage and growth rounds

  • Founder background verification and reference assessment
  • Cap table structure and dilution risk analysis
  • Governance rights, information rights and board composition
  • Revenue quality and growth sustainability assessment
  • Related-party exposure and investor conflict mapping
  • IP ownership, employment contracts and key-person risk
  • Down-round protection and liquidation preference stack
Available

Real Estate

55 unique questions calibrated for development, repositioning and income assets

  • Sponsor track record verification and reference checks
  • Equity commitment confirmation and skin-in-the-game assessment
  • Leverage review and debt service coverage stress testing
  • Permit status, entitlement risk and construction contract review
  • Asset-level cash flow quality and occupancy sustainability
  • Related-party contractor and fee extraction exposure
  • Exit strategy validation and comparable transaction analysis
Case Index · Live Demo

140 Cases. Every Collapse Documented.

Search and filter by sector, geography, collapse mechanism and fraud vector. This is a live preview of 8 cases from the full library of 140.

280Total analyses · 2 per case

Every one of the 140 cases includes two independent analyses — the forensic breakdown of what happened, and a first-person due diligence account of how the red flags would have surfaced in real time. 280 analyses total, not 140 summaries.

Showing 8 of 140 cases
EP1012020
Wirecard / BaFin
Active regulatory defense / national champion protection
Fintech / PaymentsGermanyOpportunity
Loss: €1.9B in escrow balances that never existed; DAX 30 member collapsed
EP1021997
Yamaichi Securities / Japan
Broker tobashi / client loss absorption
Securities / BrokerJapanRationalization
Loss: ¥260B (~$2.1B) in absorbed client losses; 7,500 jobs eliminated; 100-year institution surrendered license
EP1031998
Long-Term Credit Bank / Japan
Zombie lending / NPL disclosure-recognition gap
Banking / Zombie LendingJapanOpportunity
Loss: ¥3.8T in public funds; sold to Ripplewood for ¥1B; three executives arrested
EP1041999
Daewoo / South Korea
Implicit guarantee termination risk / chaebol leverage cycle
Chaebol / Corporate DebtSouth KoreaRationalization
Loss: ₩59T restructured in creditor workout; Daewoo Motor sold to GM for pennies on the dollar
EP1052009
Satyam Computer Services / India
Cash fabrication / audit circularization failure
IT Services / Accounting FraudIndiaOpportunity
Loss: ~$1B in fabricated cash; PwC fined $6M by SEC; World Bank 8-year debarment
EP822008
Icesave / Landsbanki
EEA passport deposit guarantee gap
Banking / Cross-Border SupervisionIcelandOpportunity
Loss: €6.7B in foreign deposits frozen; UK and Dutch governments compensated depositors
EP862019
H2O Asset Management / Natixis
UCITS liquidity misclassification
Asset Management / UCITSUKCapability
Loss: €1.6B frozen; €250M investor compensation; €90M management fines; firm exited UK market
EP992007
IKB Deutsche Industriebank / Germany
Off-balance-sheet ABCP conduit / first European subprime casualty
Banking / ABCP / Off-Balance-SheetGermanyOpportunity
Loss: €9.6B total cost to German taxpayers; KfW stake acquired by Lone Star for €137M; press release said "no notable impact" 10 days before rescue

Showing 8 of 140 cases. The full library includes cases from 1929 to 2024 across 30+ sectors and 40+ countries.

Access Full Case Library →
Behind Tools is a real memo generator — this is a full sample export.
Real Output · IC Memo

This Is What Gets Generated.

Up to 11 forensic dimensions per asset class (9 for Private Equity, as shown here). One IC-ready memo — produced offline, never transmitted. No FFL branding on the export. Clean enough to print and put your own name on for a real IC meeting.

STEP 3 OF 3 · IC MEMO — MERIDIAN INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS
Meridian Industrial Holdings · Private Equity
July 5, 2026 · Forensic Risk Screening · 9 Dimensions · Private Equity Calibration
1. Executive Summary

Meridian Industrial Holdings is being evaluated as a Private Equity opportunity with an expected request of $18,000,000, an ownership target of 35%, a valuation of $52,000,000, and an instrument profile of Preferred Equity with Board Seat. Proposed target returns are 22% net IRR; stated closing deadline is September 30, 2026.

2. Investment Thesis

Regional industrial components manufacturer with stable long-term supply contracts and an underleveraged balance sheet. Thesis: consolidate two adjacent product lines through a bolt-on acquisition, expand EBITDA margin from 14% to ~19% over a three-year hold, and exit via strategic sale to a larger platform or secondary buyout.

Revenue: $46M (TTM) · EBITDA margin: 14% · Customer retention: 92% · Backlog: 8 months
10. Overall Risk Score & Recommendation
58 / 100 — MODERATE RISK
Recommendation: PROCEED WITH CONDITIONS — resolve flagged dimensions before commitment
4 red flag dimensions (below 60). 5 dimensions requiring review (60–75).
7. Risk Analysis — Scorecard
DimensionScoreStatus
01 Skin in the game50/100✗ FLAG
02 Cash reserves & liquidity10/100✗ FLAG
03 Document & disclosure quality50/100✗ FLAG
04 ESG & reputational risk50/100✗ FLAG
05 Governance & step-in rights60/100⚠ REVIEW
06 Exit clarity60/100⚠ REVIEW
07 Legal & regulatory risk60/100⚠ REVIEW
08 Management background70/100⚠ REVIEW
09 Fee structure & waterfall70/100⚠ REVIEW
Red Flag Analysis — Extract · 2 of 4 Dimensions Shown
RED FLAG · SKIN IN THE GAME · SCORE 50/100
This dimension scored below the 60-point institutional threshold. Additional documentation and verification are required before this deal can proceed to investment committee.
FFL CASE REFERENCE · SIG
Compensation grant-date pattern review
Any equity-heavy compensation structure — require grant date documentation traceable to a specific dated compensation committee resolution
Statistical pattern review of historical grant-date prices against surrounding price distribution; verify post-SOX two-day reporting reflects contemporaneous approval, not a look-back within the window.
FFL CASE REFERENCE · SIG
EM PE capital call traceability
EM PE funds with capital call proceeds not traceable to underlying portfolio company accounts within standard deployment windows
Deployment window traceability is a binary due diligence gate — undeployed proceeds resting in GP-controlled accounts is the observable signal.
FFL CASE REFERENCE · SIG
Broker-dealer distribution / above-market rates
Private placement funds distributed through broker-dealer networks with above-market stated distribution rates
Above-market yield paired with restricted-access distribution is not a competitive advantage — it is a funding pressure signal.
RED FLAG · CASH RESERVES & LIQUIDITY · SCORE 10/100
This dimension scored below the 60-point institutional threshold. Additional documentation and verification are required before this deal can proceed to investment committee.
FFL CASE REFERENCE · SIG
Real estate mark-to-model in rising rates
Real estate holding companies with mark-to-model asset values and cross-entity collateral structures in rising rate environments
Cross-entity collateral pledges convert idiosyncratic asset repricing into system-wide contagion when refinancing markets tighten.
FFL CASE REFERENCE · SIG
Currency peg divergence risk
Currency peg arrangements in economies with diverging fundamentals from the anchor currency
Reserves-to-short-term-foreign-liability ratio is the observable metric before peg failure.
FFL CASE REFERENCE · SIG
Supply chain finance single-insurer risk
Supply chain finance funds where credit enhancement depends on insurance from a single provider with renewal risk
Concentration in a single credit insurer converts fund-level credit risk into a counterparty renewal event.
Review Required — 5 Dimensions Between 60–75
Governance & step-in rights — Score 60/100. Proceed with enhanced monitoring. Document why this dimension does not rise to a red flag.
Exit clarity — Score 60/100. Proceed with enhanced monitoring. Document why this dimension does not rise to a red flag.
Legal & regulatory risk — Score 60/100. Proceed with enhanced monitoring. Document why this dimension does not rise to a red flag.
Management background — Score 70/100. Proceed with enhanced monitoring. Document why this dimension does not rise to a red flag.
Fee structure & waterfall — Score 70/100. Proceed with enhanced monitoring. Document why this dimension does not rise to a red flag.
Due Diligence Checklist — Dimensions Requiring Action
Cash Reserves & Liquidity
Request 12-month cash flow model with stress scenario
Verify reserve account balance and control
Obtain commitment letters for any contingency facilities
Legal & Regulatory Risk
Verify custodian or counterparty is a regulated entity through SEC EDGAR, FCA register, or equivalent national regulator database
Obtain independent legal opinion confirming enforceability across all relevant jurisdictions and confirming clean sanctions and PEP screening on all principals
Confirm security interest perfection through public filing search (UCC, land registry, or equivalent) and verify absence of prior ranking liens
Governance & Step-In Rights
Request full governance documents and LPA/SHA
Obtain GP/sponsor conflict of interest disclosure
Verify removal mechanism and step-in rights with legal counsel
Skin In The Game
Request GP/sponsor equity commitment certificate
Verify cash vs. in-kind equity contribution
Review fee structure and deferral provisions
Exit Clarity
Request 3+ comparable transaction analyses
Verify buyer interest with market soundings
Review drag-along and tag-along provisions
Document & Disclosure Quality
Cross-check all financial statements against tax returns and bank statements
Request full litigation disclosure and legal assessment
Verify cap table with certified copy and legal opinion
Fee Structure & Waterfall
Request full fee schedule including acquisition, asset management, disposition, and any entity-level fees
Obtain waterfall model with numerical illustration of LP return scenarios at multiple exit multiples
Verify clawback mechanism and GP escrow arrangement with legal counsel
9 dimensions calibrated for Private Equity · Your answers never left this device. No data was stored or transmitted. Real exports contain no FFL branding.
Extract shown. See the full memo format in Tools.
Want to feel the engine before you buy? Answer 5 questions from one real dimension.
Try One Dimension

Legal & Regulatory Risk — 5 Questions.

One of 11 forensic dimensions in the full tool. Answer all five and see which historical failure patterns match your deal.

LEGAL & REGULATORY RISK — SAMPLE DIMENSION
07 · LEGAL & REGULATORY RISK
0 / 5 answered
Q1. Has the security interest or lien been properly perfected under applicable law and verifiable through public filing (UCC, land registry, or equivalent)?
Q2. Is the borrower entity verifiable through official corporate registry with no material adverse findings?
Q3. Has independent legal counsel confirmed the enforceability of all credit documents across relevant jurisdictions?
Q4. Are there any existing liens, encumbrances, or prior security interests that rank ahead of the proposed facility?
Q5. Has a full sanctions, PEP, and adverse media screening been conducted on all borrower principals?
That's 1 dimension out of 11 · See the full engine

Want to try the full engine — Deal Intake, Additional Context, and all 11 dimensions — end to end? Run FFL Trial free: it's the same engine, matched against a 20-case sample library instead of the full 140.

It even generates a complete IC Memo so you can see exactly what the output looks like — watermarked and locked from printing/export in this version, but otherwise the real thing.

Run the Full Trial →
The Foundation
140
Forensic Cases Documented
11
Forensic Dimensions
55
Screening Questions

Research-driven methodology based on 140 documented forensic cases from global markets, spanning 1929 to 2024 across 30+ sectors and 40+ countries. New cases added continuously.

About

Financial Forensics Labs

FFL was built by a capital markets professional with 15 years in GP/LP relations, due diligence and cross-border finance. Every case in the library is documented from primary records — not theory, not secondary sources.

Read the full story →

Every collapse has a pattern. We dissect it. Layer by layer.

Every Corporate Failure Leaves Behind a Pattern.Not For Reading. For Screening.Built For Investors, Lenders And Deal Teams.Offline. Private. Practical.
FAQ

Questions, answered.

Q-01

Does it require internet?

No. Tools runs 100% offline in your browser. You can disconnect and it still works.

Q-02

What happens to my deal data?

It never leaves your machine. Nothing is stored, uploaded or transmitted — no servers, no accounts, no telemetry.

Q-03

How is Tools delivered?

As an individually provisioned build linked to your purchase, delivered after checkout. Each copy is traceable to its buyer.

Q-04

What's the difference between Trial, Case Index and Tools?

Trial: one free dimension to test the method. Case Index: the full library of 140 documented forensic cases. Tools: the complete screening engine — all dimensions, scoring, IC memo output and the case library included.

Q-05

Can I get it in another language?

Yes. Send a message and we build a localized version of the tool for you.